| Contents:
Evaluation
Send questions to: thwang@cs.stanford.edu Last
updated:
|
6.0
Evaluation:
6.1 Survey 1 Discussion: This usability test to evaluate our prototype was rolled out in several phases: one team member sent several emails to his friends, soliciting their general comments on introduction of integrated food services at gas pump. Soon after that, a questionnaire was drafted and several informal interviews were carried out based on the (part) of questionnaire. See a sample of the two-part questionnaire below. The whole questionnaire is composed of two parts: In part one, general questions are asked to get people’s responses. People’s habits regarding whether they can pump gas without holding the handle, and if they feel comfortable ordering food menu items from a computer screen. These generic questions will confirm the assumptions we outlined earlier in design and explore the feasibility of introducing our integrated food ordering system. In part two, the questions are more geared towards to the requirements specified in system analysis stage. User responses are laid out in a gradual scale, from the most negative to the most positive. This scale method gives us a more quantitative answer whether our design meets the requirements. After the initial interview, it was discovered that the original item 3: “is the screen illumination clear enough?“ does not apply because people can not judge until the actual device is built. For this reason, the screen evaluation part was dropped. Our final result of using this questionnaire template is fairly encouraging: of all the people we email and talk with are fairly comfortable with new idea for ordering food at a gas pump. People do find it easy to read a computer screen to order food. Most people pumped the gas leaving the handle alone. At least they are aware that there is a convenient “handle” there. For these specific requirements, our prototype scores pretty high, except for the “error” messages which could not be demonstrated via the prototype screen dumps. In short, our design is moving in the correct direction and meets the requirements we set earlier. 6.2 Survey 2 Discussion: Customers at the local “coffee palace”, who like to linger over coffee provided willing participants for the survey. They filled out the surveys while refusing the team members bribes (i.e. that the team member would buy their coffee). The format of part 1 was modified after the first survey described above. Possible responses were modified slightly to four choices, Never, Sometimes, Always and Don’t Know. Here is an analysis for the responses. The participants fell into
2 groups.
The survey hints about one opportunity. People do not use the automatic feature of the pump handle. Gasoline fumes are carcinogens. The system should educate the user about this for the sake of their health. This also promotes a positive attitude among users so enlightened. Part I:
Part II:
Total Score: ______
|